ANALOGIES IN THE CONTEXT OF THE CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACH TO LEARNING
Кључне речи:
learning, analogies, constructivismСажетак
The text presents the basic settings of the constructivist approach to learning, as well as some theoretical propositions that clarify the way in which the analogies can be applied to stimulation of learning. Subsequently, the role of analogies in learning is discussed from the perspective of constructivist settings. It points to the multiple roles that analogies have in the knowledge construction process.
Референце
Антић, С. (2007). Заблуде у знању које остају упркос школском учењу. Зборник Института за педагошка истраживања, 1, 48-68.
Babić, N. (2007). Konstruktivizam i pedagogija. Pedagogijska istraživanja, 4(2), 217-229.
Bean, T.W., Searles, D., Singer, H., Cowan, S. (1990). Learning concepts from biology textthrough pictorial analogies and an analogical study guide. Journal of Educational research, 83, 233-237.
Van Boxtel, C, Van der Linden, & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Coliaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual change in science. Learning and Instruction, 10 (4), 311-330.
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155-170.
Gentner, D., Gentner, D.R. (1983). Flowing waters or teeming crowd: mental models of electricity. In D. Gentner & A.L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (99-129). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gentner, D. (2010). Bootstrapping the mind: Analogical processes and symbol systems. Cognitive Science, 34, 752-775.
Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Cognition, construction of knowledge and teaching. Syntese, 80 (1), 121-140.
Glasersfeld, E. (1990). Еnvironment and communication. In Steffe, L.P., Wood, T. (Eds.), Transforming Childrenʼs Mathematics education: International Perspectives (30-39), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrwnce Erlbaum.
Glynn, S.M., Britton, B.K., Semrud-Clikeman, M. (1989). Analogical reasoning and problem solving in textbooks. In J. A. Glover, R.R. Ronning, C.R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity: Assesment, theory, and research (383-398), New York: Plenum.
Glynn, S.M. (1991). Explaining science concepts: A teaching with analogies model. In S. Glynn, R. Yeany & B. Britton (Eds.), The Psychology of Learning Science, (219 – 204). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Glynn, S.M. (1994). Teaching science with analogies, a strategy for teachers and textbook autors. College Park, MD: National Reading Research Center.
Glynn, S.M., Takahashy, T. (1998). Learning from analogy-enhanced science text. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 1129-1149.
Glyn, S. M. (2008). Making science concepts meaningful to students: Teaching with analogies. In S. Mikelskis-Seifert, U. Ringelband, M. Brückmann (Eds.), Four decades of research in science education: From curriculum development to quality improvement (113-125). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
Glynn, S.M., Duit, R. (1995). Learning science meaningfully: Constructing conceptual models. In S.M. Glynn & R. Duit (Eds.), Learning Science in the schools: Research reforming practice (247-273). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Duit, R. (1991). On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. Science Education, 75, 649-672.
Dupin, J.J., Joshua, S. (1989). Analogies and „modeling analogies“ in teaching. Some examples in basic electricity. Science education, 73, 207-224.
Ertmer, P.E., Newby, T. J., (1993). Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism: Comparing Critical Features From an Instructional Design Perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(4), 50–72.
Jukić, R. (2013). Konstruktivizam kao poveznica poučavanja sadržaja prirodnoznanstvenih i društvenih predmeta. Pedagogijska istraživanja, 10(2), 241-263.
Justi, R., Gilbert, J. (2006). The Role of Analog Models in the Understanding of the Nature of Models in Chemistry. In P.J. Aubusson, A.G. Harrison, S.M. Ritchie (Eds.), Metaphor and Analogy in Science Education (119-130). Dortrecht: Springer.
Oldfather, P., Bonds, S., Bray, T. (1994), Drawing the circle: Collaborative mind mapping as a process for developing a constructivist teacher education program. Teacher education quarterly 21(3), 5-13. 492 – 137.
Orgill, M.K., Bodner, G.M. (2006). An analysis of the effectiveness of analogy use in college –level biochemistry textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(10), 1040-1060.
Posner, G.J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P.W., Gertzog, W.A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66 (2), 211-227.
Redish, E.F. (1994). Implications of cognitive studies for teaching physics, American Journal of Physics, 62(9), 796-803.
Remington, L.D. (1980). Teaching the nuts and bolts of chemistry. The Science Teacher, 47(9), 35-37.
Richardson, V. (1997), Constructivist teaching and teacher education: Theory and practice. In: V. Richardson (Ed.), Constructivist teacher education: building new understandings. Washington, DC: Falmer Press, 3-14.
Solomon, J. (1991). Teaching about the nature of science in the British National Curriculum. Science Education, 75 (1), 95-103.
Treagust, D.F., Duit, R., Joslin, P., Lindauer, I. (1992). Science teachers’ use of analogies: observation from classroom practice. International Journal of science Education, 14, 413-422.
Havelka, N. (2000). Učenik i nastavnik u obrazovnom procesu. Beograd: Zavod za uxbenike i nastavna sredstva.
Hamilton, R.J. (1997). Effects of three types of elaboration on learning concepts from text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 299-381.
Harrison, A.G., Treagust, D.F. (2006). Teaching and Learning with Analogies: Friend or foe? In P.J. Aubusson, A.G. Harrison, S.M. Ritchie (Eds.), Metaphor and Analogy in Science Education (11-24). Dortrecht: Springer.
Holyoak K. J., Thagard P. (1989). Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction. Cognitive Science, 13, 295-355.
Clancey, W.J. (1986). Review of Winograd and Flores’ understanding computers and cognition: A favorable interpretation. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.
Yager, R.E. (1991): The constructivist learning model: towards real reform in science education, The Science Teacher, Vol. 58, No. 6, 52-57.
