АНАЛОГИЈЕ У СВЈЕТЛУ КОНСТРУКТИВИСТИЧКОГ ПРИСТУПА УЧЕЊУ
Ključne reči:
учење, аналогије, конструктивизамApstrakt
У тексту су приказане основне поставке конструктивистичког приступа учењу као и неке теоријске поставке којима се објашњава начин на који се аналогије могу примијенити у функцији подстицања учења. Потом је улога аналогија у учењу продискутована са становишта конструктивистичких поставки. Указано је на вишеструку улогу коју аналогије имају у процесу конструкције знања.
Reference
Антић, С. (2007). Заблуде у знању које остају упркос школском учењу. Зборник Института за педагошка истраживања, 1, 48-68.
Babić, N. (2007). Konstruktivizam i pedagogija. Pedagogijska istraživanja, 4(2), 217-229.
Bean, T.W., Searles, D., Singer, H., Cowan, S. (1990). Learning concepts from biology textthrough pictorial analogies and an analogical study guide. Journal of Educational research, 83, 233-237.
Van Boxtel, C, Van der Linden, & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Coliaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual change in science. Learning and Instruction, 10 (4), 311-330.
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155-170.
Gentner, D., Gentner, D.R. (1983). Flowing waters or teeming crowd: mental models of electricity. In D. Gentner & A.L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (99-129). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gentner, D. (2010). Bootstrapping the mind: Analogical processes and symbol systems. Cognitive Science, 34, 752-775.
Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Cognition, construction of knowledge and teaching. Syntese, 80 (1), 121-140.
Glasersfeld, E. (1990). Еnvironment and communication. In Steffe, L.P., Wood, T. (Eds.), Transforming Childrenʼs Mathematics education: International Perspectives (30-39), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrwnce Erlbaum.
Glynn, S.M., Britton, B.K., Semrud-Clikeman, M. (1989). Analogical reasoning and problem solving in textbooks. In J. A. Glover, R.R. Ronning, C.R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity: Assesment, theory, and research (383-398), New York: Plenum.
Glynn, S.M. (1991). Explaining science concepts: A teaching with analogies model. In S. Glynn, R. Yeany & B. Britton (Eds.), The Psychology of Learning Science, (219 – 204). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Glynn, S.M. (1994). Teaching science with analogies, a strategy for teachers and textbook autors. College Park, MD: National Reading Research Center.
Glynn, S.M., Takahashy, T. (1998). Learning from analogy-enhanced science text. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 1129-1149.
Glyn, S. M. (2008). Making science concepts meaningful to students: Teaching with analogies. In S. Mikelskis-Seifert, U. Ringelband, M. Brückmann (Eds.), Four decades of research in science education: From curriculum development to quality improvement (113-125). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
Glynn, S.M., Duit, R. (1995). Learning science meaningfully: Constructing conceptual models. In S.M. Glynn & R. Duit (Eds.), Learning Science in the schools: Research reforming practice (247-273). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Duit, R. (1991). On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. Science Education, 75, 649-672.
Dupin, J.J., Joshua, S. (1989). Analogies and „modeling analogies“ in teaching. Some examples in basic electricity. Science education, 73, 207-224.
Ertmer, P.E., Newby, T. J., (1993). Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism: Comparing Critical Features From an Instructional Design Perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(4), 50–72.
Jukić, R. (2013). Konstruktivizam kao poveznica poučavanja sadržaja prirodnoznanstvenih i društvenih predmeta. Pedagogijska istraživanja, 10(2), 241-263.
Justi, R., Gilbert, J. (2006). The Role of Analog Models in the Understanding of the Nature of Models in Chemistry. In P.J. Aubusson, A.G. Harrison, S.M. Ritchie (Eds.), Metaphor and Analogy in Science Education (119-130). Dortrecht: Springer.
Oldfather, P., Bonds, S., Bray, T. (1994), Drawing the circle: Collaborative mind mapping as a process for developing a constructivist teacher education program. Teacher education quarterly 21(3), 5-13. 492 – 137.
Orgill, M.K., Bodner, G.M. (2006). An analysis of the effectiveness of analogy use in college –level biochemistry textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(10), 1040-1060.
Posner, G.J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P.W., Gertzog, W.A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66 (2), 211-227.
Redish, E.F. (1994). Implications of cognitive studies for teaching physics, American Journal of Physics, 62(9), 796-803.
Remington, L.D. (1980). Teaching the nuts and bolts of chemistry. The Science Teacher, 47(9), 35-37.
Richardson, V. (1997), Constructivist teaching and teacher education: Theory and practice. In: V. Richardson (Ed.), Constructivist teacher education: building new understandings. Washington, DC: Falmer Press, 3-14.
Solomon, J. (1991). Teaching about the nature of science in the British National Curriculum. Science Education, 75 (1), 95-103.
Treagust, D.F., Duit, R., Joslin, P., Lindauer, I. (1992). Science teachers’ use of analogies: observation from classroom practice. International Journal of science Education, 14, 413-422.
Havelka, N. (2000). Učenik i nastavnik u obrazovnom procesu. Beograd: Zavod za uxbenike i nastavna sredstva.
Hamilton, R.J. (1997). Effects of three types of elaboration on learning concepts from text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 299-381.
Harrison, A.G., Treagust, D.F. (2006). Teaching and Learning with Analogies: Friend or foe? In P.J. Aubusson, A.G. Harrison, S.M. Ritchie (Eds.), Metaphor and Analogy in Science Education (11-24). Dortrecht: Springer.
Holyoak K. J., Thagard P. (1989). Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction. Cognitive Science, 13, 295-355.
Clancey, W.J. (1986). Review of Winograd and Flores’ understanding computers and cognition: A favorable interpretation. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.
Yager, R.E. (1991): The constructivist learning model: towards real reform in science education, The Science Teacher, Vol. 58, No. 6, 52-57.
